Dose 2016

Typical Peer Review process:

Physicist in charge sets out a work plan and schedule • Includes literature review, manufacturers data

Preliminary meeting (critical audience!) • Background theory if appropriate • Risk analysis (databases?) • Tests to be undertaken • Detectors and techniques used • Final plan

Regular updates Final Peer Review • Results, analysis and comparison with existing data • Training and implementation plan • Ongoing QC Documentation • QART signoff Presentation to clinicians and other interested parties

Utretch 2016