ESTRO 2023 - Abstract Book

S1803

Digital Posters

ESTRO 2023

PO-2029 Autoplanning tangential IMRT technique for DIBH breast radiotherapy: a robustness evaluation.

A. Gnerucci 1 , M. Esposito 2 , A. Ghirelli 2 , S. Pini 2 , L. Paoletti 3 , R. Barca 3 , S. Fondelli 3 , P. Alpi 3 , B. Grilli 3 , F. Rossi 4 , S. Scoccianti 3 , S. Russo 2 1 University of Florence, Physics and Astronomy, Florence, Italy; 2 Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Medical Physics Unit, Florence, Italy; 3 Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Radiotherapy Unit, Florence, Italy; 4 Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Radiotherapy Unit, Grosseto, Italy Purpose or Objective Aim of the work is to evaluate the robustness of an autoplanning tangential IMRT technique adopted in DIBH Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) of left breast cancer. The dosimetric effects on OARs constraints and target volume coverage, due to the residual intrafraction movements allowed by the motion tolerances, was investigated. Materials and Methods A sample of 12 SGRT DIBH left breast treatments for a total of 192 fractions were analyzed. C-RAD Sentinel™ laser scanning system and a Siemens CT scanner were used for the prospective DIBH CT study. Base line and gating window levels (5mm amplitude) were established during CT simulation procedure. Gated treatments delivery (5mm shift threshold) was supported by the C-RAD Catalyst™ system connected with an Elekta Synergy. Planning was performed with an autoplanning tangential IMRT technique implemented in TPS Pinnacle3 v.16.2 for a dose prescription of 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions. The average of the real time isocenter displacement (SGRT shift) between the live surface and the daily reference surface during beam delivery was evaluated for each treatment fraction by analyzing the three-dimensional motion data in the log files of the optical system. Then, the perturbed dose distribution was calculated by applying this average fraction shift to the original plan isocenter. The total plan dose distribution was finally obtained by accumulating the fractions perturbed doses. The original plan and the perturbed one calculated for each patient were compared by means of Wilcoxon test on target coverage and OARs dose DVH metrics. In addition, the overall decrease in the plan quality was studied by evaluating a plan global quality indicator based on the dosimetric scoring of target coverage and OAR sparing. Results The residual intrafraction movements showed a Lateral cumulative distribution consistent with a null shift, whereas Longitudinal and Vertical ones were slightly negative (mean values <1 mm). The cumulative effect on the dose distributions of all treatment fractions was slight without any significant variations between the original and the perturbed plan target coverage and OARs DVH metrics. The variations resulted lower than 0.4 Gy for Dose metrics and 0.4% for volume metrics (fig.1). Moreover, none of the perturbed plans showed DVH metrics exceeding the mandatory constraints. The global plan quality analysis confirmed that, for this technique, the residual isocenter shifts did not worsen the plan significantly (fig.2).

Fig.1