ESTRO 2023 - Abstract Book

S1548

Digital Posters

ESTRO 2023

Conclusion In our clinic, hydrogel SpaceOAR was successfully injected into all 8 patients and these patients were treated with Radixact TomoTherapy System with minimal toxicity. Our dosimetric results shows that the use of hydrogel SpaceOAR between prostate and rectum is crucial to reduce rectal toxicity and the dose criteria was provided considering the all HFRT plans. The study showed that, when Space OAR applied, all HFRT should be opted, whereas HFRT with 70Gy and 28fx sheme should be delivered when no SpaceOAR applied.

PO-1819 Dose-to-medium and dose-to-water in photon radiotherapy dose calculations

M. Ghazal 1,2 , H. Benmakhlouf 1,2

1 Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden; 2 Karolinska Institute, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Stockholm, Sweden Purpose or Objective Modern TPSs implement dose calculation algorithms where the user can select the reported dose as dose-to-medium (Dm) or dose-to-water (Dw). Regardless of which quantity is chosen, these algorithms calculate the fluence in the patient by segmenting the CT-images into different tissue types, taking into account differences in interaction properties. Thus, Dm is always calculated and if Dw is selected, a conversion is applied. This work aims at quantifying the accuracy of Acuros in determining Dm and Dw in simple- and patient geometries. Materials and Methods The simple geometry consisted of a small cylinder of different materials placed in a water phantom. Secondly, representative clinical treatment plans were selected: H&N, lung and prostate cases (two plans per target anatomy). PRIMO, a full-scale Monte Carlo-based system, was used to model a 6 MV beam similar to that of Acuros. Dm and Dw were calculated in the cylinder and the CTVs of each plan using PRIMO and Acuros. Results Figure 1 shows the cylinder Dm and Dw, calculated by Acuros and normalized to corresponding PRIMO-calculated doses, for a number of organic materials. Using PRIMO as a reference, Dm calculated by Acuros are within 0.1% for lung, adipose, muscle and cartilage whereas it deviates by 1% for bone. This may be attributed to bone having a higher mass density and/or significantly different atomic composition. Dw in Acuros for lung, muscle and cartilage is accurately converted from Dm with an average deviation of 0.5% compared to PRIMO-calculated doses. However, Dw in adipose and bone show a 3% and 7% discrepancy, respectively. This might be due to Acuros converting Dm to Dw using electron energy deposition cross section ratios which assumes that the fluences are identical in water and medium. It has been shown by others that a fluence correction is needed for bone and adipose due to significant difference in their I-value compared to that of water. Figure 2 shows Dm and Dw calculated by Acuros normalized to PRIMO, for CTV targets in H&N, prostate and lung clinical cases. All CTV doses from Acuros are within 1%. This is due to CTVs consist mostly of muscle tissue in prostate- and H&N