ESTRO Guide 2019
Marie-Catherine Vozenin MobilityGrantChair
EVALUATIONMETHODOLOGY Applications are submitted twice per year and evaluated by a panel of four-five members of the Education Council including at least one clinician, physicist, radiation therapist (RTT) and biologist. All applications are scored according to: • Suitability and likely benefit to the applicants and their home institute. • Clarity and feasibility of the aims of the visit and methodology described. These ranking scores are used to assign priority for funding within the available budget. Applications judged to have potential merit but lacking in focus or methodological details are returned with advice on how to modify and resubmit the application.
EVALUATION PANEL Martijn Kamphuis, Radiation Therapist (RTT) Pedro Carlos Lara Jimenez, Radiation Oncologist Håkan Nyström, Physicist Sofia Rivera, Radiation Oncologist Marie-Catherine Vozenin, Biologist Main reasons for rejection: • Aims too broad and unfocused • Poor methodology • Topic or host institute not appropriate • Too commercial • Priority score too low for funding.
DEADLINES TOAPPLY: 31 MAY AND 31 OCTOBER 2019 All applications should be addressed to: grants@estro.org
Number of applicants per discipline (may include more than one applicant per proposal)
Funding rates
RADIATION ONCOLOGIST
# PROPOSALS
# FUNDED
% FUNDED
YEAR
PHYSICIST RTT BIOLOGIST TOTAL
YEAR
2008
14
9
5
3
31
2008
27
19
70
2009
21
22
8
0
51
2009
42
22
52
2010
22
21
6
0
49
2010
46
25
54
2011
17
11
3
2
33
2011
28
21
75
2012
21
15
8
0
44
2012
40
33
82
2013
33
22
6
0
61
2013
40
29
73
2014
37
28
6
1
72
2014
58
30
52
2015
34
16
6
2
58
2015
56
25
45
2016
24
13
1
3
41
2016
41
26
63
2017
17
3
3
0
28
2017
86
25
29
2018 (1 st semester)
2018 (1 st semester)
25
11
3
0
39
36
14
39
Total
256
171
55
11
507
Total
500
269
54
117
SCHOOL
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker