Gynae BT 2017

Summary

Historical

Paris

Stockholm

• Modern intracavitary applicators • Same concept as historical systems; main differences:

Manchester

Fletcher

• CT, MRI compatibility, materials • Fixed, adjustable components • Smaller channel diameters

Modern

Stockholm

• I ntracavitary technique alone:

Manchester & Fletcher

• limited possibility for 3 D adaptation

Mould

• Emerging technologies:

• Intracavitary/interstitial techniques • Comprehensive applicator IC/IS (Vienna II type) • 3D printing

Limitations of

IC Applicators

Emerging

Technologies