SBRT 2016

SBRT compared to CF-RT

SBRT

CF-RT

Local control

Local control

OS

OS 42% 30% 19% 31% 34%

Study

Year

Study

Year

76% 37% 50% 32% 56%

Hayakawa

1999

98%

75%

Nagata

2005

Jeremic

1997

92%

60%

Baumann

2009

Kaskowitz

1993

Krol

1996

88%

43%

Fakiris

2009

Morita

1997

88%

51%

Ricardi

2010

59%

Nguyen-Tan

1998

57% 78% 94%

17% 39% 42%

Sandler

1990

84%

52%

Bral

2010

Sibley

1998

98%

38%

Timmerman

2010

Slotman

1996

60% 52%  Improved LC & OS of SBRT compared to CF-RT 90% 32%

/ 13.06.2016 Matthias Guckenberger - DEGRO 2015

10