SBRT2015

PRO’s analyses in ROSEL study (n = 22)

• In all comparisons, only global health status was found to be significantly worse on univariable cox proportional hazard modeling for surgical patients when compared to SABR (HR 0.19, p=0.038). • SF-HLQ analysis: lower total productivity cost to society for SABR compared to surgery. The mean total productivity cost for SABR was €95 and €3,513 for surgery (p=0.044). • Patients reported a lower total degree of hindrance in paid and unpaid work for SABR compared to surgery (mean hindrance scores for SABR: 1.9, for surgery: 6.0, p=0.010).

Louie AV, Radioth Oncol 2015 in press